Navigating the Impact: U.S. Tariffs on Wood and Wood Products – A Global Trade Story

A Tariff Tempest Hits the Global Wood Market

In March 2025, the United States government, led by the second term of President Donald Trump, announced a trade policy that sent immediate shockwaves through the imported wood and wood products marketplace. The U.S. imposed a 25% duty on imports of softwood lumber, plywood, and engineered wood products as of March 25, after a temporary moratorium of a few days on March 4. Although the policy specifically targeted Canada, the largest exporter of lumber to the U.S., it was part of a wider tariff approach that impacted other countries.

The United States imports about 30 percent of its softwood lumber from Canada, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), but the tariffs also applied to other significant exporters, including Mexico and China, where they imposed a 25 percent duty on Mexican goods and an additional 10 percent on Chinese items (NAHB, 2025). The U.S. Department of Commerce defended the measure as a safeguard to local producers against what it described as an offensive trading environment, including subsidies in Canada and competitive pricing from other countries (U.S. Department of Commerce, 2024, as reported by CBC News, 2024). Yet this decision had a domino effect, hurting not just North America but also large wood-exporting countries such as Brazil, Russia, and Sweden, which are all dealing with the ripple effects in different ways.

The U.S. wood products market, which leans on imports to satisfy construction demand, immediately confronted uncertainty. The tariffs, which were added to a pre-existing 14.5% duty on Canadian lumber, were driving the total rate to nearly 40%, the NAHB noted, threatening to upset supply chains and elevate costs (NAHB, 2025). But the story didn’t end at the U.S.-Canada border. The tariffs had reverberations across global trade networks, impacting countries that either send wood products to the U.S. or compete in alternative markets in which displaced supply might flood. This was a story of interconnected economies, in which a single policy decision in Washington could alter the fate of sawmills, builders, and consumers around the world.

Figure: Trade weighted average (Tariffs by region, broad category and sector, percentage)

• Protectionism in the Wood Sector: US Tariffs on Wood Imports Earning a reputation for the volatile and aggressive nature of protecting its industry—similar to framing protectionism in sensitive sectors such as agriculture, the U.S. response has come in the form of heavy tariffs on wood imports in the hope of protecting its domestic industry. The 25-percent tariff—and nearly 40 percent on Canadian lumber—is just a form of protection for U.S. producers against foreign competition. Similarly, many developed countries impose high tariffs on agriculture, such as 9.5% on vegetables.
• Impact on Global Trade Dynamics: Such high tariffs are expected to turn against the dynamics of international wood trading, with wood suppliers searching for markets and trading accordingly, which sticks with the overarching perception of how tariff discrepancies shape the pattern of trade. These high U.S. tariffs would effectively reorient bypasses away from the United States—from Canadian, Mexican, and Chinese exports to other areas—thereby influencing global pricing and market shares.
• Economic Consequences for Exporting Countries: Major wood-exporting nations capable of imposing high duties on imports include Canada, Mexico, and China, each of which might suffer on their revenue from exports, which will eventually push the countries for diversification, especially. This scenario significantly disturbs Canada, which faces an excessive tariff burden of almost 40%, and it will in turn adversely affect developing countries like Mexico and China in which wood export is crucial for their growth, and similar consideration is invoked for manufacturing export by those developing members.

Canada—Bearing the Brunt of the Tariff Storm

As the U.S.’s main supplier of softwood lumber, Canada suffered from the tariffs even more profoundly. According to the NAHB, Canada accounts for 24% of softwood lumber consumption in the U.S., an essential input for the American housing industry (NAHB, 2025). A 25% tariff, which came in addition to the existing duty of 14.5%, has constituted a major hurdle and reached almost 40% of the total tariff. The Province of British Columbia, a big lumber-producing province in Canada, found the softwood lumber dispute to have cost the industry over $9 billion in duties placed in trust from 2017 so far pending resolution (Province of British Columbia, 2025). Canadian companies like West Fraser Timber and Canfor face the threat of losing U.S. market share—”60 percent of Canadian softwood lumber production usually went south”—due to the tariffs (Canadian Biomass Magazine, 2025).

Canada was clearly livid about the tariffs sanctioned under the arms of the USMCA dispute resolutions and promised retaliation against American goods (CBC News, 2025). The Bank of Canada advised that trade frictions could cause supply chain disruptions, particularly in sensitive sectors such as construction, where wood products are significant inputs (Bank of Canada, 2025). For the sawmills in Canada, the immediate problem was to seek alternative markets for the softwood lumber, which was easier said than done. The EU, which could have been one of the destinations, imposed strict compliance requirements under the EU Deforestation-free Regulation (EUDR), making it more difficult for Canada to redirect its exports (Government of Canada, 2023). Meanwhile, the U.S. construction market was bracing for increased costs because the NAHB estimates that the tariffs would raise the price of an average new single-family house by $7,500 to $10,000 (NAHB, 2025).

China—Navigating a Smaller but Strategic Impact

The Chinese wood export tariff of 20% to the U.S. in March 2025 limited its modest but rising share in the market (NAHB, 2025). Mainly exporting value-added wood products such as furniture, China has also seen how the U.S. retaliatory tariffs dampen demand for American hardwoods to the detriment of U.S. landholders (NCX, 2025). China retaliated in the WTO (Retail Council of Canada, 2025) and sought to redirect exports to the domestic and Asian markets, thus intensifying competition with Canada in Japan. Rising furniture prices also mean more pain for U.S. consumers. This tariff strategy from the White House incurs the risks of straining U.S.-China relations, alongside systemic-economic consequences in the Pacific.

Table: U.S. Tariffs on Wood and Wood Products by Country (2025)

Source: National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), U.S. Department of Commerce and  FAO Forestry Statistics, 2023

The following table summarizes the various impacts created by the U.S. tariffs on wood products. Canada gets slapped with high import duties nearing ~40% tariffs; as a result, all its lumber exports are effectively cut off, which has serious implications for trade. Mexico and China have also added other costs, thereby raising their operational expenses and shifting the market, while consumers in the United States will pay more for products than they would have otherwise. Brazil, Russia, and Sweden are not directly affected by these tariffs; however, they will suffer ripple effects like increased global competition, especially in the EU. Such illustrated tariffs disrupt supply chains, raise costs in the industry in the U.S., and hence reshape international wood markets, but they also mark the broader economic effects of U.S. trade policies.

Russia—Struggling Under Sanctions and Trade Shifts

As a major global exporter of softwood lumber, Russia suffered indirectly from the U.S. intervention. Although direct wood exports to the U.S. are strictly limited due to existing sanctions, Russia is competing in those European and Asian markets where Canadian items might have been redirected. Russia, an FAO report said, was one of the largest producers of softwood lumber in the world, with exports dominating in Europe and China (FAO Forestry Statistics, 2023). U.S. tariffs against Canada have created an oversupply risk in these markets, which is a dangerous poison as it depresses prices, squeezing Russian exporters who are already overmuch strained by the West, while Canadian producers busily seek alternative buyers.

Hence, if Russia’s wood industry, dependent mostly on European demand, already implored additional tensions from the very fact of such a regulation, then just imagine the EU Deforestation-free Regulation. The regulation now compels one to comply strictly with sustainability standards (Government of Canada, 2023). The tariffs, besides reducing revenues from exports through lower international lumber prices, indirectly impact the Russian economy. The impact on the U.S. was lesser and more indirect: potential oversupply in non-U.S. markets may lead to cheaper wood products flowing into the U.S. through third countries and undermining the tariffs’ goal of protecting domestic producers. Ironically, this situation has made clear the role of Russia in that increasingly troubled and yet painfully clear global wood market. The U.S. policy has significantly disrupted the relationships between trade flows.

Table: Russia’s Softwood Lumber Exports to Key Markets (2020-2023)

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Forestry Statistics, 2023.

The U.S. Wood Market—Caught Between Protectionism and Price Hikes

Tariffs on wood products from Canada, Mexico, and the United States came heavy on domestics. The National Association of Home Builders has estimated this would amount to upwards of $3 billion in construction material costs, with the price of an average new single-family home up by $7,500 to $10,000 (NAHB, 2025). Tariffs threaten a supply gap in softwood lumber, which the U.S. imports 30 percent of its demand for. The supply gap plus these tariffs threatened to delay construction and worsen the affordability crisis (Forest Resources Association, 2024). The White House described such tariffs as intended to encourage production in this country, but the NAHB maintained that the country lacked sufficient capacity to fully replace imports, especially in light of workforce issues and regulatory restrictions on federal forestlands (White House, 2025; NAHB, 2025).

For example, the Arizona sawmill rights grease U.S.-generated growth from states such as Oregon and Georgia. On the other hand, costlier plywood and engineered wood imported from Mexico and China were squeezing margins for builders. The U.S. furniture industry also experienced price pinching, primarily due to the importation of raw materials from China. The higher costs of these inputs may impact end consumers, leading to price increases. The significant ripple effects created by tariffs imposed on timber by one country and on another country show that wood is a truly international commodity, despite the supposed intention of protecting the industry in one country and initiating it across others worldwide.

Strategies for Survival—Global Wood Exporters Adapt

In response to the U.S. government’s new tariffs on wood products effective March 25, 2025, global exporters have adopted key strategies to mitigate the impact:

Market Diversification:

• Canada: Exploring European and Asian markets despite EU deforestation regulations.
• Mexico: Redirecting plywood exports to Latin America and domestic markets.
• China: Expanding furniture sales in Asia to meet growing demand.

Advocacy:

• Canada: Lobbying for exemptions through trade associations like the B.C. Lumber Trade Council.

Leveraging Strengths:

• Sweden: Emphasizing sustainability to maintain EU market share.
• Brazil: Focusing on pulp and paper exports to compete in Europe.

Cost Optimization:

• We are cutting costs by negotiating with suppliers and selling pre-tariff inventories.

Product Innovation:

• The industry is shifting to value-added products like cross-laminated timber, which are less affected by tariffs.

Key Takeaways—A Global Wood Market in Flux

The effects of the U.S. wood tariffs and associated items, effective March 25, 2025, have had ramifications around the world:

• Significant Impacts to Global Trade Created by the Imposition of Tariffs by the U.S.
• The tariffs have changed the flow of trade globally, making it difficult for trade to function for some of the larger exporters, namely Canada, Mexico, and China.

Worst Hit: Canada

As an importer of 24% of the softwood lumber consumed in the U.S. (NAHB, 2025), Canada suffered the most; indeed, tariffs were threatening to limit market access and thereby reduce export revenues.

Duties Directly Hit Mexico and China

• Mexico: Hit with 25% duties on plywood exports, which have curtailed exports to the extent of redirecting markets into Latin America and domestic.
• China: Applied a 20% duty on furniture exports, so now exports are shifting into Asia.

Brazil, Russia, and Sweden: The Ripple Effect

Indirectly, these countries faced increased competition and downward price pressure in alternative markets like Europe, exacerbated by strict legislation such as the EU Deforestation-free Regulation (Government of Canada, 2023).

U.S. with Economic Repercussions

ThesAccording to NAHB (2025), tariffs have increased U.S. construction costs by $3 billion, resulting in a rise in home prices from $7,500 to $10,000. This has revealed unexpected adverse domestic effects.

Tariffed Exporters on Their Own in an Unstable World: 

As of March 25, 2025, the world wood products market remains in a volatile state as exporters seek diversification in markets and the optimization of their operational costs while undertaking advocacy to address the challenge of these stalled trades.

Custom Market Insights can help your business navigate this current tariff situation. See our

• Global Timber Plants Market 2024–2033 – The present report covers the demand for timber plants across various industries, including construction, furniture, and paper production.
• Global Paper and Forest Products Market 2024–2033 – This market provides insights into the production, trade, and sustainability trends in paper and forest-based products globally.
• Global Carded Packaging Market 2025–2034 – Analyzes the growth of carded packaging solutions across retail, electronics, and consumer goods sectors.

Please feel free to contact us today—your solution is just a step away! [email protected]